Choose one of the following questions to answer as an initial post. Then respond to one peer. Refer to the syllabus for due dates of initial post and peer response.
Week 7: Chapter 13

What are the challenges facing public reporting in the future, and how would you address them? How would you go about redesigning the way health care is purchased and consumed to incen­tivize patients to be better consumers of health care?
List and describe the five steps in the Lean quality improvement process. Use a nursing process issue to demonstrate utilization of the Lean quality improvement process.

Reflections posts are due in the Discussion Tab Thursday night and replies due Sunday night of same week. Initial answers to the discussion should be at least 300 words. Responses to one peer are required for full credit for any week. Resources/References per APA style must be added in your graded response, and are not included the word count.The Reflection is based on the assigned readings for the class.

Post your entry to the appropriate discussion. You will have 2 questions each week from which to choose. Review the initial post due date on the course schedule.
Read the responses posted from your classmates. Choose ONE student answer that you would like to “weigh-in” on. It may be that you agree with their responses/answer OR if may be that you see the situation very differently based on experience.

Then respond to that person’s posting—but remember! “I agree” or “good post” (or some variation of this) is not a sufficient response! When answering questions OR in your responses to your colleagues, use YOUR OWN professional experiences and opinions. It makes it a rich way to share and learn about each other. Review the due date for the peer response post on the course schedule.

Grading of Online DiscussionsEach module is worth 10 points each. Grading is based on pertinent thought and content given to answering questions for each module and your responses to your classmates’ postings. Correct spelling and grammar is expected. Assignments should be submitted on time and to the appropriate Discussion.
Grading Criteria
Performance/Points
Criteria
Satisfactory: Full Points (10)

Your answer to this week’s discussion is thought provoking and thorough while providing the forum with additional discussion from your peers, and elicits critical thinking.
The initial answer is posted by the due date.
The student responds to a peer by the due date of the discussion. Peer response is thought-provoking and provides support and/or another viewpoint to their questions or answers.
Posts have correct spelling and grammar and meets word minimum.

Marginal: 5-9 points

Your answer adds to the discussion, but could be developed more.
The student responds to one of their peers by the due date. Peer response adds to the discussion, but could be developed more.
It has incorrect spelling and/or grammar or does not meet word minimum.

Unsatisfactory: 0-4 points

The question is answered briefly with little effort of discussion provoking your peers to respond. Very little critical thinking or effort utilized to answer the questions, no contribution to further discussion.
There is no response to a peer.

 

"Order a similar paper and get 30% discount on your first order with us. Use the following coupon “SUPER50"

Essay Writing Service